Pearson

Pearson MyPedia: Selling to School Principals the Way B2B Actually Works

MyPedia wasn't sold to parents or students, it was sold to the people who decide what a school teaches with: principals, trustees, and school leaders. ibs Fulcro built a genuinely targeted B2B media strategy around exactly who those people are, not a broad education-sector campaign.

1.8xGrowth in revenue
100%Increase in conversions
150%Increase in impression share
50%Reduction in cost per lead

At a glance

Client: Pearson Education (Education (B2B, School Partnerships))

Problem: A broad, education-sector-wide campaign would waste budget reaching parents and students, when the real MyPedia buying decision sits with principals, trustees, and school leaders specifically.

Solution: A genuinely targeted B2B media strategy built around the real decision-makers, principals, trustees, and school leaders, not a generic education-sector campaign.

Result: Growth in revenue: 1.8x

ibs Fulcro's role: Performance Marketing

About Pearson MyPedia

MyPedia is a learning ecosystem that transforms education delivery in schools affiliated with CBSE and ICSE, integrating every learning and teaching tool into a well-designed, scientific approach. It isn't a single product, it's a whole-school academic partnership programme built to improve students' cognitive skills by continuously partnering with everyone involved in the learning process: teachers, school leaders, parents, and students themselves. Built for Pre-Primary through Grade 8, MyPedia aims to improve both how teachers teach and how students learn.

The Challenge

The objective was to build a strong digital media presence and reach the actual decision-makers, school principals, trustees, and board members, looking to raise the level of teaching in their schools with interactive learning solutions, and to help those schools set up a genuinely integrated learning approach. That meant solving several distinct problems at once: identifying the right B2B audience in the first place, working with limited branded and non-branded search volume, reducing cost per demo and acquisition, integrating the sales funnel across digital and offline channels, and finding and fixing content gaps that were quietly costing conversions.

The Strategy

The approach started by understanding which sources in the funnel were actually performing, then running daily campaign optimisation across Google Search, Display, YouTube, Facebook, and affiliate partners to find missing opportunities and refine targeting by demographic, age group, and interest. After analysing historic campaigns, Facebook and LinkedIn were identified as having real potential to drive additional conversions and reach a wider audience. Budget saved by reducing Google Search's cost per lead was reinvested there as a trial, and scaled further once those channels started producing genuinely good leads.

A new vernacular communication strategy improved lead quality directly, cut the cost of calling prospects, and enabled a regional team structure that made the sales experience more personal. Landing pages were rebuilt for page speed, with separate mobile and desktop versions, and the lead form and key content moved above the fold, alongside clear, direct calls to action.

Reaching the Real Decision-Makers

Creative That Taught, Rather Than Just Sold

Platform-Wise Share of Revenue

By the end of the campaign, Facebook was driving 45% of revenue, the single largest channel, followed by LinkedIn and Google Search at 20% each, with Display and Remarketing contributing the remaining 15%. That mix reflects the strategy directly: Facebook and LinkedIn, initially funded by savings from a more efficient Google Search programme, had grown to carry the majority of the campaign's commercial results.

50%
Reduction in cost per lead

Why this number mattered as much as the revenue growth. Revenue growing 1.8x while cost per lead simultaneously dropped by half means the campaign wasn't buying growth with a bigger budget, it was buying more, better leads with the same money. That's the number that made reinvesting savings into Facebook and LinkedIn possible in the first place.

Why This Matters Beyond One Campaign

The transferable lesson here is treating a B2B education sale like the B2B sale it actually is, not a consumer education campaign aimed broadly at “parents” or “schools.” Targeting real job titles on LinkedIn, using real peer-school names for interest targeting, and building creative that demonstrated the product's teaching value directly, rather than just claiming it, produced a fundamentally more efficient funnel than a broad-reach campaign ever could have.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

A whole-school academic partnership programme for CBSE and ICSE schools, from Pre-Primary to Grade 8, integrating learning and teaching tools and partnering with teachers, school leaders, parents, and students to improve teaching and learning outcomes.

School principals, trustees, and board members, the real decision-makers for adopting an interactive learning solution at their school, not parents or students directly.

Revenue grew 1.8x, conversions increased by 100%, impression share increased by 150%, and cost per lead was reduced by 50%.

Facebook drove 45% of revenue, LinkedIn and Google Search each drove 20%, and Display and Remarketing contributed the remaining 15%.

Campaigns targeted specific real job titles across school leadership, including Principal, Vice-Principal, Deputy Head Teacher, School Counsellor, and Trustee, reaching 41,000 potential LinkedIn members, alongside interest-based targeting built around real peer and competitor schools.

A vernacular communication strategy improved lead quality, reduced the cost of calling prospects, and enabled a regional sales team structure that personalised the experience for prospects across different parts of India.

Let's talk about what a similar engagement could look like for your brand

Start a Project