Nippon India Mutual Fund

23,97,000 Average Visits, a 59.03% Bounce Rate, and 4th Place Among 5 Direct Competitors

Competitive traffic, audience, and channel-mix analysis against DSP, SBI Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential, and HDFC Mutual Fund, using Similarweb data from June to August 2024.

23,97,000Average visits, Jun-Aug 2024 (4th of 5 competitors by visits)
59.03%Bounce rate, the highest among all 5 competitors compared
2.19Pages per visit, the lowest among all 5 competitors compared
42.76%Share of traffic from organic search

Average Visits vs. Direct Competitors (Jun-Aug 2024)

WebsiteAverage Visits
sbimf.com54,77,000
hdfcfund.com33,41,000
icicipruamc.com33,00,000
mf.nipponindiaim.com23,97,000
dspim.com14,42,000

Nippon holds 4th place by volume among 5 competitors compared. Source: Similarweb, ibs Fulcro audit.

Full Traffic Engagement Comparison (Jun-Aug 2024)

MetricNippon IndiaDSPSBI MFICICI PruHDFC MF
Monthly visits8,34,7025,46,96819,06,00010,61,00010,80,000
Monthly unique visitors5,63,1183,34,5739,48,6275,32,9155,49,152
Visits / unique visitor1.481.632.011.991.97
Avg. visit duration0:03:080:02:170:04:270:04:030:05:02
Pages per visit2.193.813.974.624.69
Bounce rate59.03%62.41%46.03%49.19%40.75%
Total page views18,29,60020,86,00075,65,00049,70,00050,63,000

Nippon has the lowest pages-per-visit and second-highest bounce rate of all 5 sites compared. Source: Similarweb, ibs Fulcro audit.

The engagement gap matters more than the traffic gap. Nippon's visits are competitive with ICICI Prudential and HDFC, but its 2.19 pages-per-visit and 59.03% bounce rate are both the weakest in the set. This is consistent with the UX and performance findings elsewhere in this audit: people are arriving, but the site isn't holding their attention once they do.

Marketing Channel Mix vs. Competitors

ChannelNippon IndiaDSPSBI MFICICI PruHDFC MF
Direct33.45%49.27%45.79%51.53%46.17%
Organic search42.76%36.71%48.67%31.01%46.82%
Paid search17.92%5.79%0.17%10.36%1.74%
Social1.14%3.57%1.73%1.76%1.03%
Referrals4.59%4.21%3.07%4.27%4.00%
Display ads0.13%0.44%0.54%1.06%0.22%

Source: Similarweb, ibs Fulcro audit, Jun-Aug 2024.

What the Channel Mix Shows

Nippon has the highest paid search dependency in the set, at 17.92%

This is more than triple ICICI Prudential's 10.36% and vastly higher than SBI's 0.17%. Nippon is comparatively reliant on paid acquisition rather than earned channels.

Direct traffic share (33.45%) is the lowest of all 5 competitors

Every competitor in the set draws a higher share of direct, branded traffic, suggesting relatively lower brand-search strength or habitual return visits.

Organic search share (42.76%) is solid but skews heavily mobile

63.36% of organic traffic is mobile versus 36.64% desktop, an imbalance that tracks directly with the far worse mobile Lighthouse scores documented in the technical audit.

Social traffic is minimal at 1.14%, but strongly mobile-weighted

92.66% of Nippon's social traffic is mobile, indicating whatever social presence exists is being consumed almost entirely on phones.

Referral Traffic by Source Network

NetworkNippon IndiaDSPSBI MFICICI PruHDFC MF
YouTube38.58%25.31%71.42%21.81%30.86%
LinkedIn48.54%13.06%5.63%11.03%18.52%
WhatsApp Webapp0%2.70%17.15%31.31%0%
Facebook0%13.84%5.81%18.18%17.38%
Twitter9.47%35.57%0%0%0%
Instagram0%0%0%16.45%2.95%

Nippon draws 48.54% of referral traffic from LinkedIn, the highest LinkedIn share of any competitor in the set, but records 0% from WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram. Source: Similarweb, ibs Fulcro audit.

Audience: Gender and Age Distribution

Nippon's visitor base skews 81.20% male and 18.80% female, closely in line with every competitor in the set (all cluster between 78% and 82% male). The age distribution shows 48.88% of visitors in the 25-34 bracket, the single largest segment, with 17.06% in the 18-24 bracket, the highest Gen Z share among the four competitors compared on this metric.

Website Feature Comparison vs. 6 Competitors

FeatureNippon IndiaDSP MFSBI MFICICI PruHDFC MF
Categorised user loginYesYesNoYesYes
Website search functionNoYesYesYesYes
BlogsNoYesYesYesNo
PodcastNoYesYesYesNo
WhatsApp chatNoYesYesNoYes
Request a callbackNoYesYesYesNo
Multi-language facilityYesNoNoNoNo
Product compareYesYesNoNoNo

Nippon is the only site in this comparison without a working on-site search function, a genuine gap versus all 4 direct competitors listed. Source: ibs Fulcro competitive audit.

Recommendations From Traffic and Channel Data

Improve desktop SEO specifically

Organic search skews heavily mobile; a deliberate desktop content and technical push could rebalance this and lift overall organic share.

Continue optimizing paid search, but push for efficiency

Given the comparatively high 17.92% paid dependency, focus on improving conversion rate and traffic quality, not just volume.

Increase investment in display advertising

At 0.13% of traffic, display is minimal; a modest, well-targeted increase could meaningfully diversify the channel mix.

Build a genuine content engine to close the blog and podcast gap

Every major competitor in this set runs both; Nippon runs neither.

Add on-site search as a baseline fix

Every competitor except Nippon offers this; it is a foundational usability gap, not a nice-to-have.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Nippon India ranks 4th of 5 competitors compared by average visits (23,97,000), behind SBI Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, and ICICI Prudential, and ahead of DSP.

Pages per visit and bounce rate. Nippon India records 2.19 pages per visit, the lowest in the set, and a 59.03% bounce rate, the second-highest. Traffic volume is competitive, but visitors aren't exploring the site once they arrive.

Organic search at 42.76% of traffic, though skewed heavily mobile at 63.36% versus 36.64% desktop. Paid search is also comparatively high at 17.92%, more than triple ICICI Prudential's share and vastly higher than SBI's 0.17%.

An on-site search function. Nippon India is the only site among the 4 direct competitors compared that lacks working on-site search, a foundational usability gap rather than a nice-to-have.

Let's talk about what a similar engagement could look like for your brand

Start a Project